Infusing blended learning with voice and choice

August 21, 2017 | by Jenny White

group learning twitter croppedmodel of blended learning rarely looks the same across classrooms. The models of course aren’t designed to be molds but to be guiding choreographies for a teacher and her students—and inevitably those individuals bring ingenuity to the craft as they improvise to create deeper and more customized learning opportunities. In the case of one 4th-grade teacher in District of Columbia Public Schools highlighted in our latest case study, her blended-learning approach often dances skillfully between models to help her class become stronger, actively engaged learners.

Kaila Ramsey, a 2016 Education Innovation Fellow and math teacher at H.D. Cooke Elementary, had used the Lab Rotation and Station Rotation models for several years. Her model had consisted of a simple rotation between whole-group instruction and online time, where all of the students would pull out their laptops or move into a lab to use ST Math two days a week. Stations or learning centers were used on other days, where students would rotate between learning activities and teacher time throughout the class period. She had always preserved whole-group time each day in order to maintain inquiry-based learning and help students work together collaboratively to solve a single problem.

Gradually, however, Ramsey recognized limitations to her model that prompted her to rethink the consistent routine she had set. For one, three stations a day were challenging to manage and the students lost learning time during station transitions. Second, as a teacher, Ramsey wanted a way to track which modalities were helping which students to learn successfully. “With every student going to every station every day, how was I to know which activity prompted the learning?” Ramsey explained. “I had no clue which station on which day was driving learning.”

Ramsey appreciated that data from online programs like ST Math might provide some clues, but she needed a temperature gauge at other stations to truly understand which stations and activities helped her students to learn. To accomplish this, Ramsey put her students on one station per day where they would spend 30 to 45 minutes either working with the teacher, working online, or working on independent work. Additionally, at the independent work stations, she began to offer multiple activities from which students could choose. This way, Ramsey could identify which specific activities were helping her students progress. It was at this juncture that she recognized a powerful yet underused source of information on students’ learning: her students.

“I realized, they can easily tell you what they know and don’t know. They know their strengths and weaknesses,” Ramsey said. Taking that into account, she developed a peer-to-peer station where a student struggling with a particular skill or standard could partner up with a student who had really mastered that standard. Ramsey posted a dashboard in the classroom that let students both keep track of concepts they understand or need support with and quickly match up with a classmate whom they could could help or seek tutoring from.

“I had students every day write their name down next to certain concepts they were struggling [with] or succeeding in,” Ramsey described. “That way they would know what they needed to be working on and who could help them.” In the peer-to-peer station, both students recorded and showed their own work on a worksheet, allowing Ramsey to view each student’s progress during that station.

Having watched her students self-identify weak spots in their learning, and observed students in other classrooms through the Fellowship, Ramsey understood that her students were capable of taking a greater degree of ownership over their learning process. She began to perceive student choice as a powerful lever for learning. “The big a-ha for me was on student engagement,” she said. “As part of the fellowship we went through the design thinking process, and what stood out for me was how powerfully students responded to choice and self-selecting their learning activities. They preferred to manage their own time and choose what to work on. I also learned that students want a balance with whole group and small group.”

Ramsey has adapted her model accordingly, carving out more choice in each daily station. She created a mock personalized learning platform in the learning management system Canvas where students could view their teacher-tailored options of assignments and select the stations they worked on. “We now have weekly check-ins on Wednesdays where we are looking at their data, conferencing, and I can help guide their activities for the rest of the week,” Ramsey added. The platform has also started solve Ramsey’s challenge of not knowing what modality was working—and it makes the path to progress transparent to both teacher and student. “[The students] see the results of their choices at the end of the week, see when their peers are doing better, and understand why,” Ramsey said.

Today, Ramsey’s class generally spends three days a week working through complex problems with an inquiry-based approach to learning. On these days, students are presented with a complex problem, and after working in small groups and as a whole, they apply concepts they have recently learned to piece together a solution. On non-inquiry days students work at stations where they can self-select the activities they perform at each station, including both individual work activities and peer-to-peer instruction. Through her classroom model, Ramsey aims to help students develop self-management skills while still learning content, particularly given that her students stand to benefit from extra noncognitive learning support. Though before the fellowship Ramsey wrestled over time with how much free choice to offer students, she now believes that giving students choice not only boosts their engagement, but also empowers them to be active, self-directed learners.

“Giving my students choice is about fundamentally restructuring the way a child interacts with school,” Ramsey explained. “Students who have been pigeon-holed as ‘low-achieving’ students often have less ownership of their learning time than their higher-achieving peers in other parts of the city. I view choice as a lever to attack inequity and the types of experiences we provide for our students.” In this vein, over the course of the school year, Ramsey gradually moved her class toward an individual playlist that students set for themselves on a bi-weekly basis. “We’re moving closer to completely free choice,” Ramsey said. “Choice has empowered students to own more parts of their learning experience. They are not just more engaged in the activities but are also invested in the outcomes.”

Ramsey’s journey with blended learning is one of five stories from District of Columbia Public Schools and Bella Romero Academy featured in the Institute’s latest case study, “Blended (R)Evolution: How 5 teachers are modifying the Station Rotation to fit students’ needs”.

To see what other districts around the world are doing with the Station Rotation, explore the Blended Learning Universe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.